Any software teams adopt coderabbit.ai or similar tools to their team workflow after adopting agentic assisted coding? I’m genuinely curious because I’ve noticed that agentic coding only gets you to the next bottleneck which is reviewing code.
1
I just graduated with my bachelor's in computer science at 26. I had a good GPA, but it took me a few extra years to get through the program for various personal reasons. My main concern right now is the age gap. Since I'm starting my career a few years behind the typical age group, I'm worried I might never catch up financially or professionally. Will companies view my age as a red flag for entry-level roles, and does starting later cap my ultimate career trajectory?
Frontend Developer We are seeking a Frontend Developer to build responsive, user-friendly web applications and deliver exceptional user experiences /n Responsibilities Develop and maintain web applications using HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and modern frameworks (React, Angular, or Vue). Requirements - 2+ years of frontend development experience. - Strong knowledge of HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and TypeScript.
My current full-time job is a total dead end and I'm miserable, but it's stable. A recruiter reached out about a contract-to-hire position that's exactly what I want to be doing, but I'm wondering if it's just going to be a glorified temp job. Would it be crazy to leave a permanent position for this?
Not code rabbit specifically but cursor code reviews do find some bugs and we get claude to auto resolve it. It lightens the load but not too much. Prevention is better than the cure tbh... scoping your task before coding it up makes it more likely to have a smaller PR which in turn makes it quicker to review and resolve.
I figured, so has your ram adopted both?