Glassdoor users rated their interview experience at Xerox as 50% positive with a difficulty rating score of 2.5 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty). Candidates interviewing for Software Intern and Chair Filler rated their interviews as the hardest, whereas interviews for Software Intern and Chair Filler roles were rated as the easiest.
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at Xerox (Poissy) in Jun 2022
Interview
Très sympathique à l’embauche, premier entretien avec la RH. Ensuite entretien avec un manager et présentation des locaux lors du deuxième entretien et ils nous rappellent pour donner leur réponse
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Vous avez déjà fait de la prospection ? Terrain et téléphonique ? Vous seriez prêt à rester un peu plus tard pour signer des contrats ?
I applied online. I interviewed at Xerox (Cebu City) in Apr 2026
Interview
My interview experience with Xerox was smooth and professional. The recruitment team was accommodating, responsive, and clear with the instructions throughout the process. The interview was conducted online, and there was nothing to worry about because the process was friendly and comfortable and the interviewers were very kind and approachable.
Overall, it was a positive experience, and I truly appreciate the time and assistance provided by the recruitment team
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
About your self, work experiences and about the role you are applying.
This was the MOST UNPROFESSIONAL and DISRESPECTFUL interview processes I’ve ever experienced.
I interviewed on a Monday and was told I would hear back as early as Thursday that same week. Instead, I was completely ghosted for four weeks. No updates, no communication, nothing. I even followed up with the recruiter and was ignored.
After WASTING AN ENTIRE MONTH OF MY TIME, they finally sent a generic rejection email.
This is not just poor communication, it shows a complete LACK OF RESPECT FOR CANDIDATES. It felt like I was being kept on hold as a backup option while they continued searching for someone “better” or cheaper. That kind of behavior speaks volumes about how this company operates.
The process was DISORGANIZED, CARELESS, and FRANKLY INSULTING. If this is how they treat candidates, it’s hard to imagine their internal management being any better.
Given this level of INEFFICIENCY and DISREGARD for people, it’s not surprising their stock price is where it is. At this rate, it’ll take a miracle to get back to anything resembling its past.
Do yourself a favor: DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME INTERVIEWING HERE. There are far better companies that actually respect candidates.